International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2026
Predictors of linkage to prevention services after HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP): A single-centre retrospective analysis, years 2019-2024.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Esvan Rozenn, Micheli Giulia, Giacinta Alessandro, Caioli Alessandro, Barchi Virginia, Oliva Alessandra, Schiavone Riccardo, Lener Alice, Gennaro Elisabetta, Passacantilli Sara, Vairo Francesco, Faccendini Paolo, Antinori Andrea, Mazzotta Valentina
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) remains underutilised and real-world data on its role within prevention pathways are limited. We aimed to describe PEP use following sexual exposure and to identify predictors of linkage to prevention services within three months in a real-world clinical setting.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of PEP prescriptions following sexual exposure at the HIV Voluntary Counselling and Testing site of the National Institute for Infectious Diseases in Rome. Data included demographics, exposure, prior PEP/PrEP use, and follow-up through March 31, 2025. Mixed-effect logistic regression identified predictors of linkage to prevention services within three months.
RESULTS: A total of 1366 PEP prescriptions were issued to 1188 individuals from January 2019 - December 2024. In 85.1% of the occasions, users were assigned male at birth and in 80.5% Italian-born. The most common exposures included receptive anal intercourse (35.3%), insertive anal intercourse (26.5%), insertive vaginal intercourse (11.2%), and sexual assault (8.5%). Prior PEP and PrEP were reported in 16.7% and 4.7% of the occasions, respectively. Follow-up was recommended in all; PrEP was advised in 46.1% occasions and initiated in 17.4%. Overall, users returned for follow-up in 46.5% of the cases. Multivariable analysis (n = 871) showed that active PrEP recommendation and age ≥35 years were positively associated with reattendance, while foreign birth and prior PEP were negatively associated. Nine persons (0.7%) were tested HIV positive; two at baseline and seven after PEP, suggesting missed opportunities for timely prevention.
CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale analysis from an Italian setting highlights the role of PEP as an entry point into HIV prevention pathways, while confirming gaps in linkage to ongoing preventive care. The Italian context, characterised by a high proportion of late HIV diagnoses and ongoing PrEP implementation, underscores the importance of strengthening prevention strategies. Structured follow-up and facilitated linkage to PrEP, when appropriate, may help maximise its preventive impact.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of PEP prescriptions following sexual exposure at the HIV Voluntary Counselling and Testing site of the National Institute for Infectious Diseases in Rome. Data included demographics, exposure, prior PEP/PrEP use, and follow-up through March 31, 2025. Mixed-effect logistic regression identified predictors of linkage to prevention services within three months.
RESULTS: A total of 1366 PEP prescriptions were issued to 1188 individuals from January 2019 - December 2024. In 85.1% of the occasions, users were assigned male at birth and in 80.5% Italian-born. The most common exposures included receptive anal intercourse (35.3%), insertive anal intercourse (26.5%), insertive vaginal intercourse (11.2%), and sexual assault (8.5%). Prior PEP and PrEP were reported in 16.7% and 4.7% of the occasions, respectively. Follow-up was recommended in all; PrEP was advised in 46.1% occasions and initiated in 17.4%. Overall, users returned for follow-up in 46.5% of the cases. Multivariable analysis (n = 871) showed that active PrEP recommendation and age ≥35 years were positively associated with reattendance, while foreign birth and prior PEP were negatively associated. Nine persons (0.7%) were tested HIV positive; two at baseline and seven after PEP, suggesting missed opportunities for timely prevention.
CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale analysis from an Italian setting highlights the role of PEP as an entry point into HIV prevention pathways, while confirming gaps in linkage to ongoing preventive care. The Italian context, characterised by a high proportion of late HIV diagnoses and ongoing PrEP implementation, underscores the importance of strengthening prevention strategies. Structured follow-up and facilitated linkage to PrEP, when appropriate, may help maximise its preventive impact.