DOI 10.1007/s00234-025-03889-3
Deep learning-accelerated 3D flair for white matter lesion detection in multiple sclerosis: a feasibility study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction (DLBIR) techniques promise accelerated MRI acquisitions with enhanced image quality. Herein, we compare the image quality of a DLBIR-based 3D FLAIR (3D-FLAIRDL) with conventional 3D FLAIR (3D-FLAIRSOC) in a cohort of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Our prospective, reader-blinded study, included 26 MS patients who underwent both sequences on a 3T scanner during the same study session over three months. Two neuroradiologists assessed noise, artifacts, sharpness, overall image quality, and diagnostic confidence using 4-point Likert-like scales. Lesion conspicuity was graded for lesions < 3 mm and ≥ 3 mm. Quantitative metrics included lesion count, apparent signal-to-noise ratio (aSNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (aCNR). A composite gold standard was used to calculate sensitivity and precision.
RESULTS
3D-FLAIRDL showed significantly better qualitative scores (p < 0.001) with high inter-reader agreement. Lesion conspicuity and diagnostic confidence improved, especially for < 3 mm lesions. DLBIR images detected 29 additional lesions (10 ≥ 3 mm-sized lesions and 19 < 3 mm lesions), yielding higher sensitivity (99.5% vs. 88.8% for < 3 mm; 100% vs. 97.9% for ≥ 3 mm) without false positives. aSNR and aCNR were significantly higher for DLBIR images (p < 0.001). Acquisition time was reduced by 32% (3:54 vs. 5:44 min).
CONCLUSION
DLBIR 3D FLAIR significantly improves lesion detection and image quality in MS, supporting its potential integration into standard imaging protocols. As DLBIR algorithms evolve, further validation in larger, diverse cohorts will be essential.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.