MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5152/turkarchpediatr.2022.21223

Медицинская библиотека · Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2022

Evaluation of Suspected Macrolide Allergies in Children.

Süleyman Ayşe, Yücel Esra, Tamay Zeynep Ülker, Güler Nermin

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Macrolides are often accepted as safe antibiotics due to their low allergenicity. However, studies on macrolides, particularly studies evaluating cross-reactivity in macrolides, are highly rare in children. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical manifestations, confirmation rate, and frequency of cross-reactivity in children admitted with suspicious clarithromycin or azithromycin allergy.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A total of 61 children suspected of macrolide antibiotic allergy (clarithromycin, n = 39 and azithromycin, n = 22) were evaluated. Allergy work-up including drug provocation tests were performed in all patients to confirm drug allergy.

RESULTS

Macrolide allergy was confirmed in 9.8% (n = 6) of patients (azithromycin, 18.2% [n = 4] and clarithromycin, 5.1% [n = 2]). There was no significant difference between the confirmation rate of clarithromycin and azithromycin (P = .117). Cross-reaction with clarithromycin was confirmed in 2 (33.3%) patients with azithromycin allergy.

CONCLUSION

Drug skin tests are not capable of confirming or ruling out macrolide allergy, and oral provocation tests are essential for a definitive diagnosis. Cross-reactivity, albeit rare, can occur between clarithromycin and azithromycin, which are the most frequently used macrolides in children.

Для цитирования: Süleyman Ayşe, Yücel Esra, Tamay Zeynep Ülker, Güler Nermin. Evaluation of Suspected Macrolide Allergies in Children.. Turkish archives of pediatrics. 2022. DOI: 10.5152/turkarchpediatr.2022.21223.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.