DOI 10.1038/s41598-026-57670-4
Training set augmentation and biology-aware harmonization improve radiomic models for lung cancer prediction in indeterminate nodules.
Аннотация
CT radiomics-based machine learning has potential to predict lung cancer in pulmonary nodules (PNs) earlier than standard-of-care methods. Low malignancy rates in early-development PNs and variable image acquisition hinder development of radiomic models for diagnosing these PNs. To address these challenges, we augmented training using later-development PNs and harmonized for acquisition effects. We examine early-development benign and malignant PNs (n = 106) below the sensitivity of standard-of-care diagnosis. Classifiers predicting malignancy performed near chance when trained on ComBat-harmonized radiomic features from only early-development PNs. We then augmented training with later-development benign and malignant PNs (n = 225). We evaluated whether harmonization must incorporate biology that impacts acquisition effects in added training data. To correct variability from four acquisition protocols, we compared: (1) biology-unaware harmonization, (2) harmonizing with a covariate distinguishing early-development, later-development benign, later-development malignant datasets, (3) harmonizing each dataset separately. Models trained using augmentation, but biology-unaware harmonization, failed to improve consistently. Augmented training data harmonized with a covariate (ROC-AUC 0.74 [0.69-0.79]) or separately (ROC-AUC 0.71 [0.66-0.77]) yielded higher test ROC-AUC (Delong, p ≤ 0.05) and PR-AUC (Wilcoxon, p ≤ 0.05). In a proof-of-principle methodological study, we demonstrate with a small single-center dataset that combining radiomic features from later-development benign and malignant PNs requires biology-aware harmonization.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.