Thrombosis research · 2013
Development of a new laboratory test to evaluate antithrombin resistance in plasma.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murata Moe, Takagi Akira, Suzuki Atsuo, Okuyama Eriko, Takagi Yuki, Ando Yumi, Kato Io, Nakamura Yuki, Murate Takashi, Matsushita Tadashi, Saito Hidehiko, Kojima Tetsuhito
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: We recently reported a variant prothrombin (p.Arg596Leu: prothrombin Yukuhashi) that confers antithrombin resistance to patients with hereditary thrombosis. To detect antithrombin resistance in plasma, we devised a laboratory test analyzing the kinetics of thrombin inactivation using antithrombin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After incubation with prothrombin activator components (phospholipids, CaCl2, and snake venom), samples were treated with excess antithrombin in the presence or absence of heparin for various time periods. Subsequently, H-D-Phe-Pip-Arg-p-nitoranilide was added and changes in absorbance/min (ΔA/min) were measured at 405 nm.
RESULTS: After 1 min inactivation using antithrombin and heparin, the relative residual thrombin activity of recombinant mutant prothrombin (34.3% ± 2.2%) was higher than that of the wild-type (6.3% ± 1.2 %). After 30 min without heparin, the relative residual thrombin activity of recombinant mutant prothrombin (95.8% ± 0.4%) was higher than that of the wild-type (10.1% ± 1.7%), indicating that this assay could detect antithrombin resistance of the variant 596Leu prothrombin. Moreover, warfarinized plasmas from 2 heterozygous patients with prothrombin Yukuhashi mutation clearly showed higher values of the relative residual thrombin activity than those from 5 thrombosis patients lacking the mutation in the presence or absence of heparin.
CONCLUSIONS: We have devised a laboratory test to detect antithrombin resistance in plasma by analyzing the kinetics of thrombin inactivation using antithrombin. This assay may be useful for detecting antithrombin resistance in plasma, even in warfarinized patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After incubation with prothrombin activator components (phospholipids, CaCl2, and snake venom), samples were treated with excess antithrombin in the presence or absence of heparin for various time periods. Subsequently, H-D-Phe-Pip-Arg-p-nitoranilide was added and changes in absorbance/min (ΔA/min) were measured at 405 nm.
RESULTS: After 1 min inactivation using antithrombin and heparin, the relative residual thrombin activity of recombinant mutant prothrombin (34.3% ± 2.2%) was higher than that of the wild-type (6.3% ± 1.2 %). After 30 min without heparin, the relative residual thrombin activity of recombinant mutant prothrombin (95.8% ± 0.4%) was higher than that of the wild-type (10.1% ± 1.7%), indicating that this assay could detect antithrombin resistance of the variant 596Leu prothrombin. Moreover, warfarinized plasmas from 2 heterozygous patients with prothrombin Yukuhashi mutation clearly showed higher values of the relative residual thrombin activity than those from 5 thrombosis patients lacking the mutation in the presence or absence of heparin.
CONCLUSIONS: We have devised a laboratory test to detect antithrombin resistance in plasma by analyzing the kinetics of thrombin inactivation using antithrombin. This assay may be useful for detecting antithrombin resistance in plasma, even in warfarinized patients.