MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.90.798

Медицинская библиотека · Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology · 1999

[The so-called megaureter-megacystis syndrome: a case report].

Kurokawa Y, Soo L K, Yokota K, Kanayama H, Kagawa S

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We encountered a patient with megaureter-megacystis syndrome showing a giant bladder and dilated ureters with marked reflux, which is very rare; to our knowledge, only 2 patients have been reported in Japan. The patient was a 4-year-old boy, who showed inborn polyposia and polyuria, and proteinuria at the age of 1 year. He visited the pediatric department in our hospital complaining of cold-like symptoms, stomachache and diarrhea. Urinary infection and kidney dysfunction were observed, and the patient was hospitalized for close examination. Bilateral pyelocaliceal hydronephrosis was detected by ultrasonography, and the patient was referred to our department. CT revealed bilateral hydronephrosis (right atrophic kidney), hydroureters and megacystis. Bilateral grade V vesicoureteral reflux, an increase in the bladder volume (> 300 ml), and urination without residual urine were noted by voiding cystourethrography. Uroflowmetry revealed that maximum flow rate was 21.6 ml/sec, voided volume was 110 ml, and residual volume was 24 ml. From these examinations, the patient was diagnosed as having megaureter-megacystis syndrome, and underwent antireflux operation of the bilateral ureters using Cohen's procedures.

Для цитирования: Kurokawa Y, Soo L K, Yokota K, Kanayama H, Kagawa S. [The so-called megaureter-megacystis syndrome: a case report].. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology. 1999. DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.90.798.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.