MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00134-024-07756-2

Медицинская библиотека · Intensive care medicine · 2025

The Brussels consensus for non-invasive ICP monitoring when invasive systems are not available in the care of TBI patients (the B-ICONIC consensus, recommendations, and management algorithm).

Robba Chiara, Picetti Edoardo, Vásquez-García Sebastián, Abulhasan Yasser B, Ain Amelia, Adeleye Amos O, Aries Marcel, Brasil Sérgio, Badenes Rafael, Bertuccio Alessandro, Bouzat Pierre, Bustamante Luis, Calabro' Lorenzo, Njimi Hassane, Cardim Danilo, Citerio Giuseppe, Czosnyka Marek, Geeraerts Thomas, Godoy Daniel A, Hirzallah Mohammad I, Devi Bhagavatula Indira, Jibaja Manuel, Lochner Piergiorgio, Mijangos Méndez Julio C, Meyfroidt Geert, Munusamy Thangaraj, Portilla Juan Pinedo, Prabhakar Hemanshu, Rasulo Frank, Sánchez Parra Diana M, Sarwal Aarti, Shrestha Gentle S, Shukla Dhaval P, Sung Gene, Tirsit Abenezer, Vásquez Franly, Videtta Walter, Wang Yu Lin, Paiva Wellingson S, Taccone Fabio Silvio, Rubiano Andres M

СтатьяConsensus StatementПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Invasive systems are commonly used for monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and are considered the gold standard. The availability of invasive ICP monitoring is heterogeneous, and in low- and middle-income settings, these systems are not routinely employed due to high cost or limited accessibility. The aim of this consensus was to develop recommendations to guide monitoring and ICP-driven therapies in TBI using non-invasive ICP (nICP) systems.

METHODS

A panel of 41 experts, that regularly use nICP systems for guiding TBI care, was established. Three scoping and four systematic reviews with meta-analysis were performed summarizing the current global-literature evidence. A modified Delphi method was applied for the development of recommendations. An in-person meeting with group discussions and voting was conducted. Strong recommendations were defined for an agreement of at least 85%. Weak recommendations were defined for an agreement of 75-85%.

RESULTS

A total of 34 recommendations were provided (32 Strong, 2 Weak) divided into three domains: general consideration for nICP use, management of ICP using nICP methods and thresholds of nICP tools for escalating/de-escalating treatment. We developed four clinical algorithms for escalating treatment and heatmaps for de-escalating treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a mixed-method approach involving literature review and an in-person consensus by experts, a set of recommendations designed to assist clinicians managing TBI patients using nICP systems plus clinical assessment, in the presence or absence of brain imaging, were built. Further clinical studies are required to validate the potential use of these recommendations in the daily clinical practice.

Для цитирования: Robba Chiara, Picetti Edoardo, Vásquez-García Sebastián, Abulhasan Yasser B, Ain Amelia, Adeleye Amos O, Aries Marcel, Brasil Sérgio, Badenes Rafael, Bertuccio Alessandro, Bouzat Pierre, Bustamante Luis, Calabro' Lorenzo, Njimi Hassane, Cardim Danilo, Citerio Giuseppe, Czosnyka Marek, Geeraerts Thomas, Godoy Daniel A, Hirzallah Mohammad I, Devi Bhagavatula Indira, Jibaja Manuel, Lochner Piergiorgio, Mijangos Méndez Julio C, Meyfroidt Geert, Munusamy Thangaraj, Portilla Juan Pinedo, Prabhakar Hemanshu, Rasulo Frank, Sánchez Parra Diana M, Sarwal Aarti, Shrestha Gentle S, Shukla Dhaval P, Sung Gene, Tirsit Abenezer, Vásquez Franly, Videtta Walter, Wang Yu Lin, Paiva Wellingson S, Taccone Fabio Silvio, Rubiano Andres M. The Brussels consensus for non-invasive ICP monitoring when invasive systems are not available in the care of TBI patients (the B-ICONIC consensus, recommendations, and management algorithm).. Intensive care medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07756-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.