MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/00016357.2010.536908

Медицинская библиотека · Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2010

Effect of root-canal sealer on the bond strength of fiberglass post to root dentin.

Cecchin Doglas, Farina Ana Paula, Souza Matheus Albino, Pereira Charles Da Cunha

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of different root-canal sealers on the bond strength of a fiberglass post cemented with self-adhesive resin cements.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Forty extracted maxillary single-rooted canines were prepared with the crown-down technique and randomly divided into four groups according to the tested sealer: Group 1: control group, gutta-percha cone only (no sealer); Group 2: EndoREZ; Group 3: Sealapex; Group 4: Endofill. The roots were obturated with the gutta-percha cone using the cold lateral compaction technique. Fiberglass posts were cemented into the prepared post spaces with the self-adhesive cement RelyX Unicem. Bonded specimens were sectioned into 1-mm thick slabs and a push-out test was performed in a universal machine.

RESULTS

Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = 0.05). No significant difference was detected between Groups 1-3 (P > 0.05). Group 4 showed a lower bond strength than the other sealers (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Endofill negatively interfered with the bond to root dentine; however, EndoRez and Sealapex did not affect the bond strength of the fiberglass post cemented with self-adhesive resin cements.

Для цитирования: Cecchin Doglas, Farina Ana Paula, Souza Matheus Albino, Pereira Charles Da Cunha. Effect of root-canal sealer on the bond strength of fiberglass post to root dentin.. Acta odontologica Scandinavica. 2010. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2010.536908.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.