MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13256-024-04719-5

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical case reports · 2024

Guide to extraluminal fish bone retrieval with serial computed tomography scans: a case series.

Yew Ting Ting, Tang Ing Ping, Lim Li Yun, Cheah Yuanzhi, Yew Shiong Leong

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Fish bone ingestion is commonly encountered in emergency department. It poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge particularly when it migrates extraluminally, necessitating a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach for successful management.

CASE PRESENTATION: Here we reported four cases of extraluminal fish bone. The first patient was a 68-year-old Chinese man who had odynophagia shortly after a meal involving fish. The second was a 50-year-old Iban man who reported a sharp throat pain after consuming fish 1 day prior. The third patient was a 55-year-old Malay woman who developed throat pain and odynophagia after consuming fish 1 day earlier. The fourth patient, a 70 year-old Iban man, presented late with odynophagia, neck pain, swelling, and fever 1 week after fish bone ingestion. These unintentional fish bone ingestions faced challenges and required repeat computed tomography scans using multiplanar reconstruction in guiding the surgical removal of the fish bone.

CONCLUSION

We underscore the significance of multiplanar reconstruction in pinpointing the fish bone's location, demonstrating the migratory route, and devising an accurate surgical plan.

Для цитирования: Yew Ting Ting, Tang Ing Ping, Lim Li Yun, Cheah Yuanzhi, Yew Shiong Leong. Guide to extraluminal fish bone retrieval with serial computed tomography scans: a case series.. Journal of medical case reports. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-024-04719-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.