Journal of cardiac failure · 2021
Contemporary Provider Management Practices and Attitudes Toward Referral for Advanced Heart Failure Therapies in Fontan Patients Across North America.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sadat-Hossieny Sara, Karamlou Tara, Marino Bradley S, Gossett Jeffrey G, Schumacher Kurt, Patel Angira, Worley Sarah, Alsaied Tarek, Amdani Shahnawaz
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To date, no reports have described clinicians' management practices for patients with Fontan circulatory failure or their understanding of risk factors for mortality and transplant outcomes in these patients.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A cross-sectional survey of caregivers across North America was conducted from February to September 2020. Responses were compared by primary specialty (heart failure/transplant vs non-heart failure/transplant), years of experience (early, mid, and late career), and Fontan center volume (low, medium, and high). Of 400 responses, the majority were from general cardiologists (111, 28%) followed by heart failure/transplant specialists (93, 23%). Although most agreed that patients with Fontan physiology will have signs/symptoms of heart failure (369 [93%]) and eventuate in heart transplant (286 [72%]), many disagreed (180 [45%]) that routine evaluation by a transplant cardiologist is needed without symptoms. Transplant providers were more likely than non-transplant providers to suggest referral for manifestations of Fontan circulatory failure such as protein-losing enteropathy, plastic bronchitis, liver fibrosis/cirrhosis, and worsening valve regurgitation. Non-transplant providers were more likely to suggest that protein-losing enteropathy, plastic bronchitis, and Fontan-associated liver disease lead to inferior outcomes after transplantation. Early career and transplant providers more favorably viewed ventricular assist device use for Fontan patients failing traditional heart failure therapy (P < .05 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in the management of Fontan patients, including heterogeneous timing of referral of such patients to the heart failure/transplant team, which may have implications for future outcomes.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A cross-sectional survey of caregivers across North America was conducted from February to September 2020. Responses were compared by primary specialty (heart failure/transplant vs non-heart failure/transplant), years of experience (early, mid, and late career), and Fontan center volume (low, medium, and high). Of 400 responses, the majority were from general cardiologists (111, 28%) followed by heart failure/transplant specialists (93, 23%). Although most agreed that patients with Fontan physiology will have signs/symptoms of heart failure (369 [93%]) and eventuate in heart transplant (286 [72%]), many disagreed (180 [45%]) that routine evaluation by a transplant cardiologist is needed without symptoms. Transplant providers were more likely than non-transplant providers to suggest referral for manifestations of Fontan circulatory failure such as protein-losing enteropathy, plastic bronchitis, liver fibrosis/cirrhosis, and worsening valve regurgitation. Non-transplant providers were more likely to suggest that protein-losing enteropathy, plastic bronchitis, and Fontan-associated liver disease lead to inferior outcomes after transplantation. Early career and transplant providers more favorably viewed ventricular assist device use for Fontan patients failing traditional heart failure therapy (P < .05 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in the management of Fontan patients, including heterogeneous timing of referral of such patients to the heart failure/transplant team, which may have implications for future outcomes.