MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11701-025-03031-8

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of robotic surgery · 2025

Association between objective performance indicators and patient outcomes in robotic surgery: a systematic review.

Ahmed Shaheer, Waqar Usama, Salar Hashim, Salar Musa, Irshad Hammad Atif, Khan Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi, Shields Mallory C, Olson Terrah J Paul, Rosen Seth Alan

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Robotic surgery enables automated capture of objective performance indicators (OPIs), which reflect gestures at the surgeon consoles as well as activity at the patient cart. This systematic review evaluated associations between OPIs and clinical outcomes from robotic surgery. Across nine studies, OPIs were associated with various intra-operative and post-operative outcomes, including estimated blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, continence recovery, quality of life, and positive surgical margins. Studies involving predictive models demonstrated improved outcome prediction when combining OPIs with patient and disease characteristics compared to using clinical variables alone. These findings suggest that OPIs provide meaningful data in regard to surgical quality and patient outcomes. Further multicenter research across surgical specialties and robotic platforms is needed to validate the potential utility of OPIs in surgical training, benchmarking, and quality assessment.

Для цитирования: Ahmed Shaheer, Waqar Usama, Salar Hashim, Salar Musa, Irshad Hammad Atif, Khan Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi, Shields Mallory C, Olson Terrah J Paul, Rosen Seth Alan. Association between objective performance indicators and patient outcomes in robotic surgery: a systematic review.. Journal of robotic surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-03031-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.