Standard Versus Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

For decades, pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) has been a critical component of radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. Although its role in curative surgery for high-risk non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive cases is well-established, the therapeutic advantages of extended PLND remain a topic of ongoing debate.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of major bibliographic databases was performed from inception to November 2024. Studies comparing extended PLND (extended or super extended) with standard PLND were identified. Data for clinical outcomes was extracted and pooled estimates were calculated using a random effects model with RevMan 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies (2 RCTs and 9 observational) were included reporting data for 4001 patients. The pooled analysis demonstrated that extended PLND was associated with significantly better recurrence-free survival (HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.60-0.74). Standard PLND led to significantly higher 5-year recurrence rates (RR=1.44, 95% CI: 1.28-1.62) compared with the extended approach. The pooled estimates for disease-specific survival (HR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.62-1.19), overall survival (HR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.86-1.16), and complications remained comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended PLND can lead to favorable recurrence-free survival and 5-year recurrence rates. However, retrospective observational studies mainly drive the evidence, and additional RCTs are required to reach a definitive conclusion.