Journal of pediatric urology · 2011
Decision making among different treatment options for neurologically impaired boys with undescended testis: a multinational pediatric survey.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Springer Alexander, Kidger Elizabeth, Krois Wilfried, Fengler David, Reck Carlos A, Horcher Ernst
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the attitude of referring pediatricians towards the decision of treatment modalities for undescended testis (UDT) in neurologic impaired boys (NIB).
METHODS AND MATERIALS: An online questionnaire was offered to registered pediatricians in Austria and Germany for online completion.
RESULTS: 221 male (61.6%) and 138 female (38.4%) pediatricians completed the survey; 326 (90.8%) believe that UDT should be treated according to national guidelines; 31 (8.6%) believe that UDT should be treated according to the parental wish, whereas only 2 (0.6%) tend to no treatment at all. Tumor prophylaxis, further sexual life, legal concerns, risks of anesthesia, and the choice of the parents have major impact on the perception of UDT. Moreover, fertility and limited life expectancy seem to be of minor importance only. In general, Pearson χ2 test could not identify age and sex of pediatricians as significant predictor of how the importance of the treatment of UDT is appraised.
CONCLUSION: From the pediatric point of view UDT in NIB is an important issue and should be treated according to guidelines. Nevertheless, this study indicates the problems in decision-making and choosing the best management for UDT in NIB. Undoubtedly, further ethical discussion is needed to optimize treatment of UDT in NIB.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: An online questionnaire was offered to registered pediatricians in Austria and Germany for online completion.
RESULTS: 221 male (61.6%) and 138 female (38.4%) pediatricians completed the survey; 326 (90.8%) believe that UDT should be treated according to national guidelines; 31 (8.6%) believe that UDT should be treated according to the parental wish, whereas only 2 (0.6%) tend to no treatment at all. Tumor prophylaxis, further sexual life, legal concerns, risks of anesthesia, and the choice of the parents have major impact on the perception of UDT. Moreover, fertility and limited life expectancy seem to be of minor importance only. In general, Pearson χ2 test could not identify age and sex of pediatricians as significant predictor of how the importance of the treatment of UDT is appraised.
CONCLUSION: From the pediatric point of view UDT in NIB is an important issue and should be treated according to guidelines. Nevertheless, this study indicates the problems in decision-making and choosing the best management for UDT in NIB. Undoubtedly, further ethical discussion is needed to optimize treatment of UDT in NIB.