American journal of nephrology · 1997
Is the red cell morphology really useful to detect the source of hematuria?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Favaro S, Bonfante L, D'Angelo A, Giacomini A, Normanno M, Caló L, Bordin V, Vianello D, Meani A, Antonello A, Borsatti A
Аннотация
Morphological analysis of urinary red blood cells by phase-contrast microscopy to identify the source of bleeding was, and still is, widely used also as a starting point for workup. To evaluate the reliability of this approach, we studied 129 outpatients presenting with persistent isolated microhematuria; 31 subjects also had mild proteinuria (1 g/day), while 21 had pathological albumin levels. All patients were followed for a period of 6 years. During this time, 6 patients underwent renal biopsy for the onset of macrohematuria episodes and proteinuria of 2-3 g/day. Glomerular bleeding was identified in only 14.7% of the patients, despite the persistent microhematuria and the presence of proteinuria or microalbuminuria. The renal origin of the urinary erythrocytes correlated with histological findings in only 2 of 6 patients with dysmorphic erythrocytes who developed proteinuria (exceeding 1 g/day), and none with isomorphic erythrocytes showed urological abnormalities. These results challenge the validity and reliability of morphological analysis to identify the source of bleeding along the urinary tract.