MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.110967

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2026

Delayed Diagnosis of a Large Parietal Meningioma Presenting as Progressive Proprioceptive Loss: A Case Report and Review of Diagnostic Bias Across Specialties.

Fadel Mahdi N, Fadel Ali, Fadel Farah, Shuayto Marwan

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Meningiomas are common intracranial tumors, but their slowly progressive and atypical presentations are frequently mistaken for peripheral neurologic, musculoskeletal, or ocular conditions. We describe a 60-year-old left-handed man who developed several months of progressive right-sided gait imbalance, proprioceptive deficits, intermittent binocular visual blurring, and late cognitive changes. Evaluations by podiatry, chiropractic care, physical therapy, and optometry initially failed to uncover the cause. Brain MRI eventually revealed a large left posterior parietal dural-based mass with classic meningioma features, marked vasogenic edema, mass effect, and midline shift. Gross-total resection confirmed a WHO grade 1 meningioma (Ki-67 index 15 %). This case emphasizes an atypical presentation with progressive unilateral gait dysfunction accompanied by proprioceptive loss, pyramidal signs, visual symptoms, or cognitive decline. Refractory treatments should prompt early neuroimaging, even after negative peripheral workups. It also highlights how specialty-specific anchoring bias can delay recognition of central nervous system lesions.

Для цитирования: Fadel Mahdi N, Fadel Ali, Fadel Farah, Shuayto Marwan. Delayed Diagnosis of a Large Parietal Meningioma Presenting as Progressive Proprioceptive Loss: A Case Report and Review of Diagnostic Bias Across Specialties.. Cureus. 2026. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.110967.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.