The orthogonal measurements approach in estimating spleen size on CT images.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To find out which single measurement and/or linear regression model correlates well with splenic volume using the orthogonal measurements approach.
METHODS
The study relied on retrospective analysis of 205 contrast-enhanced abdominal CT examinations carried out in adult patients using a 320-detector CT system. CT volumetry was conducted by a semi-automated, model and threshold based segmentation algorithm that enables voxel-based volume calculation of abdominal organs. The orthogonal measurements were carried out in axial sections by measuring the maximum diameters of spleen projected in sagittal, coronal and transverse planes. In addition, we calculated the diagonal diameter of spleen, which is a derivative of orthogonal measurements. Statistical analysis included calculation of interobserver agreement on orthogonal measurements, followed by model building using linear regression analysis of the measurements.
RESULTS
The interobserver agreement between two radiologists was very strong for all orthogonal measurements (r ≥ 0.971). The highest model performance was detected with the diagonal diameter (r2 = 0.956), followed by the superoinferior diameter (r2 = 0.857). Agreement statistics revealed that the regression formula derived from the diagonal diameter outperformed that of superoinferior diameter.
CONCLUSION
The diagonal diameter appears to be the best parameter which correlates with splenic volume, whereas the superoinferior diameter can be an alternative in daily CT reporting practice. The orthogonal measurements approach not only provides a high interobserver agreement, but also the diagonal diameter can be translated into ultrasound studies.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.