Ceratohyoidectomy in standing sedated horses.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the feasibility and complications associated with ceratohyoidectomy (CHE) in standing sedated horses unaffected (experimental horses) and standing sedated horses affected (clinical cases) with temporohyoid osteoarthropathy (THO).
STUDY
DESIGN
Case series.
ANIMALS: Six experimental horses and four clinical cases.
METHODS
Standing CHE was performed in six experimental horses euthanized 30 minutes (n = 3) and 7 days (n = 3) postoperatively. The four clinical cases were presented because of central facial nerve paralysis (n = 3), vestibular ataxia (n = 3), auricular hemorrhage (n = 2), quidding (n = 1), and oesophageal impaction (n = 1). Evolution was assessed by clinical examination during hospitalization and later by telephone interviews for the clinical cases.
RESULTS
The procedure was successfully performed in all horses. Experimental horses did not show any short-term postoperative complications. Hemorrhage was experienced intraoperatively in one of the clinical cases and was successfully managed with placement of hemostatic forceps. Vestibular ataxia and other symptoms of THO improved within days, but facial nerve paralysis did not improve until 9 days to 6 months after surgery. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 24 months. All clinical cases returned to performance, and client satisfaction was excellent.
CONCLUSION
Ceratohyoidectomy was consistently feasible in standing sedated horses. The method did not result in postoperative complications and led to resolution of clinical signs associated with THO.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Standing CHE should be considered in horses affected with THO, especially when horses present with marked vestibular deficits and ataxia, to reduce risks associated with recovery from general anesthesia.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.