DOI 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.09.013
Racial and ethnic disparities in clinical outcomes among patients with takotsubo syndrome; A nation-wide analysis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Takotsubo syndrome (TTS), a stress-induced transient left ventricular dysfunction, remains poorly understood, with an estimated incidence of 1-2 % among acute coronary syndrome cases. This study investigates racial and ethnic disparities in hospital outcomes and clinical characteristics of TTS.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample data from 2016 to 2020, identifying TTS cases through validated ICD-10 codes. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 18, with logistic regression models adjusting for confounders to identify disparities in outcomes.
RESULTS
The study included 32,785 TTS hospitalizations; the majority were White (80.5 %), followed by Black (6.7 %) and Hispanic (5.8 %) patients. Minority groups, mainly Black and Hispanic patients, were younger (average age 63) and predominantly from lower-income brackets, while Asians had the highest income bracket. Length of stay (5.1 days) and Total cost ($22,707.60) were highest among Native Americans. Notable findings include Black patients showing the highest rate of stroke (4.8 %, OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.2 to 3.4, p = 0.003). The rate of cardiogenic shock was highest among Asians (11 %, OR 2, 95 % CI 1.5 to 2.5, p < 0.001). Mortality rates were elevated in Black (2 %, OR 1.5, 95 % CI 1.3 to 1.7 p < 0.001) and Asian populations (1.8 %, OR 1.97, 95 % CI 1.5 to 2.5, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Significant racial and ethnic disparities exist in TTS outcomes, with minority groups having more in-hospital outcomes. These findings highlight the urgent need for targeted interventions and further research to reduce healthcare inequities in TTS management.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.