AIDS (London, England) · 2001
HIV protease inhibitor substitution in patients with lipodystrophy: a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicentre study.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carr A, Hudson J, Chuah J, Mallal S, Law M, Hoy J, Doong N, French M, Smith D, Cooper D A, PIILR Study Group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lipodystrophy, dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance often complicate protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral therapy. The aims of this study were to determine if these are reversible with continued HIV suppression following protease inhibitor substitution.
METHODS: Eighty-one HIV protease inhibitor recipients (78 male; mean antiretroviral therapy, 55 months) with predominant peripheral lipoatrophy, HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml plasma for at least the preceding 6 months, and no prior abacavir, non-nucleoside analogue or adefovir therapy were randomized 3 : 2 to continue nucleoside analogues and substitute protease inhibitor(s) with abacavir, nevirapine, adefovir and hydroxyurea (n = 49) or to continue all therapy (n = 32) with an option to switch at week 24. The primary endpoints were total body fat and HIV RNA at week 24. Other assessments were regimen safety, regional body composition, metabolic parameters, quality of life, and CD4 T-lymphocyte counts to week 48.
RESULTS: There was a greater decline in total body fat in the switch group than in the continue group (-1.6 and -0.4 kg, respectively at week 24; P = 0.006). This comprised greater declines in limb and subcutaneous abdominal fat, and in intra-abdominal fat of patients with moderate or severe abdominal fat accumulation. Viral suppression was similar, despite 18 (37%) switch group patients ceasing at least one study drug by week 24 because of adverse events. Total cholesterol and triglycerides declined more in the switch group (both P < 0.002). High density lipoprotein cholesterol increased significantly in both groups at week 48 (P < 0.02). There was no change for any glycaemic parameter.
CONCLUSIONS: In predominantly lipoatrophic patients, switching from HIV protease inhibitor therapy lead to improved lipids and less intra-abdominal fat, but also to less peripheral fat, and had minimal effect on insulin resistance. Virological control in these heavily pretreated patients was unaffected, despite frequent switch drug cessations.
METHODS: Eighty-one HIV protease inhibitor recipients (78 male; mean antiretroviral therapy, 55 months) with predominant peripheral lipoatrophy, HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml plasma for at least the preceding 6 months, and no prior abacavir, non-nucleoside analogue or adefovir therapy were randomized 3 : 2 to continue nucleoside analogues and substitute protease inhibitor(s) with abacavir, nevirapine, adefovir and hydroxyurea (n = 49) or to continue all therapy (n = 32) with an option to switch at week 24. The primary endpoints were total body fat and HIV RNA at week 24. Other assessments were regimen safety, regional body composition, metabolic parameters, quality of life, and CD4 T-lymphocyte counts to week 48.
RESULTS: There was a greater decline in total body fat in the switch group than in the continue group (-1.6 and -0.4 kg, respectively at week 24; P = 0.006). This comprised greater declines in limb and subcutaneous abdominal fat, and in intra-abdominal fat of patients with moderate or severe abdominal fat accumulation. Viral suppression was similar, despite 18 (37%) switch group patients ceasing at least one study drug by week 24 because of adverse events. Total cholesterol and triglycerides declined more in the switch group (both P < 0.002). High density lipoprotein cholesterol increased significantly in both groups at week 48 (P < 0.02). There was no change for any glycaemic parameter.
CONCLUSIONS: In predominantly lipoatrophic patients, switching from HIV protease inhibitor therapy lead to improved lipids and less intra-abdominal fat, but also to less peripheral fat, and had minimal effect on insulin resistance. Virological control in these heavily pretreated patients was unaffected, despite frequent switch drug cessations.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdenineAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveBody CompositionCarnitineDideoxynucleosidesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHIV-1HumansHydroxyureaInsulin ResistanceLipodystrophyMaleMiddle AgedNevirapineOrganophosphonatesQuality of LifeRNA, ViralReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeAbacavir