MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14777.x

Медицинская библиотека · Anaesthesia · 1990

Propofol for long-term sedation in the intensive care unit. A comparison with papaveretum and midazolam.

Harris C E, Grounds R M, Murray A M, Lumley J, Royston D, Morgan M

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Thirty-seven patients with a wide range of illnesses were studied during mechanical ventilation of the lungs in an intensive care unit. Fifteen were sedated with a continuous propofol infusion, with analgesia provided by bolus doses of papaveretum. Twelve received a continuous infusion of papaveretum, supplemented by bolus doses of midazolam. The level of sedation was assessed every four hours and measurements were made of haemodynamic and respiratory variables. Levels of sedation were generally satisfactory in both groups. Six patients who received propofol required the use of muscle relaxants, because of their strong respiratory drives, to achieve synchronisation with the ventilator. There was no significant difference in respiratory or haemodynamic variables between the groups, but several patients required inotropic support because of their disease. There was no evidence of inhibition of adrenal steroidogenesis in the propofol group. Propofol can be a useful sedative agent in the intensive care unit, but sedative regimens should be tailored to individual patient requirements.

Для цитирования: Harris C E, Grounds R M, Murray A M, Lumley J, Royston D, Morgan M. Propofol for long-term sedation in the intensive care unit. A comparison with papaveretum and midazolam.. Anaesthesia. 1990. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14777.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.