MedElevator
Войти в исследования RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin · 1997
[Antegrade scrotal phlebography of the v. spermatica in left-sided testicular varicocele--are retrograde phlebographic classifications suitable for typing?].
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bruns T, Born O, Ergün S, Tauber R
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The study was conducted to clarify whether the use of classifications in base of retrograde phlebography would be sufficiently suitable for typifying the findings of antegrade phlebography examinations of the internal spermatic vein with regard to antegrade sclerotherapy.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In course of antegrade sclerotherapy in 236 patients with previously untreated idiopathic left-sided varicocele, phlebography via scrotal approach was performed. The results were compared with the relevant findings of the pre-existing classifications of the retrograde exams.
RESULTS: Comparison with the classifications of Bähren and Braedel showed distinct discrepancies. In 28.8% (Bähren) respectively 36.4% (Braedel) of our findings, typification was unsuccessful. Correspondence was found with the Riedl-classification. Collateral vessels however, are not sufficiently differentiated.
CONCLUSION: Retrograde classifications proved insufficient in typifying the findings of antegrade phlebography of the internal spermatic vein. A more subtle classification is required. This has been worked out and presented.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In course of antegrade sclerotherapy in 236 patients with previously untreated idiopathic left-sided varicocele, phlebography via scrotal approach was performed. The results were compared with the relevant findings of the pre-existing classifications of the retrograde exams.
RESULTS: Comparison with the classifications of Bähren and Braedel showed distinct discrepancies. In 28.8% (Bähren) respectively 36.4% (Braedel) of our findings, typification was unsuccessful. Correspondence was found with the Riedl-classification. Collateral vessels however, are not sufficiently differentiated.
CONCLUSION: Retrograde classifications proved insufficient in typifying the findings of antegrade phlebography of the internal spermatic vein. A more subtle classification is required. This has been worked out and presented.