MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.11.009

Медицинская библиотека · Complementary therapies in medicine · 2018

Efficacy of rhythmical massage in comparison to heart rate variability biofeedback in patients with dysmenorrhea-A randomized, controlled trial.

Vagedes Jan, Fazeli Aurelia, Boening Anna, Helmert Eduard, Berger Bettina, Martin David

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

20-90% of all women suffer from dysmenorrhea. Standard therapy of primary dysmenorrhea (PD) are NSAIDs and oral contraceptives, effective but not without possible side effects.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy of rhythmical massage (Anthroposophic Medicine) and heart rate variability biofeedback compared to usual care (control group) on pain intensity in women with primary dysmenorrhea.

METHODS

This was a three-arm randomized controlled study. Both interventions (rhythmical massage once a week or HRV biofeedback 15 min daily) were carried out over a period of three months. The third group (control) applied usual care. The primary outcome were between-group differences in mean pain intensity (detected by a Numeric Rating Scale, NRS) during menstruation after three months (post-assessment, t2). Secondary outcomes were the use of analgesics, quality of life (SF-12) and heart rate variability.

RESULTS

The study involved 60 women, mean age 29.7 years, SD 8.0 (n = 23 rhythmical massage, n = 20 biofeedback, n = 17 control). For the primary outcome there was a significant difference between the groups after three months (p = .005). Bonferroni adjusted post-hoc tests revealed a significant difference between rhythmical massage and control group (mean difference: -1.61; 95 CI: -2.77/-0.44; p = .004; ES: -0.80). No significant differences were found between rhythmical massage and biofeedback (mean difference: -0.71; 95 CI: -1.82/ 0.40; p = .361; ES: -0.34) and between biofeedback and control group (mean difference: -0.90; 95 CI: -2.10/-0.30; p = .211; ES: -0.51). For the secondary outcomes no significant differences were found between the groups at t2. The drop-out rate was higher in the biofeedback group (n = 6) than in the massage (n = 2) or the control group (n = 4).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary evidence suggests that rhythmical massage might improve pain intensity after 12 weeks compared to usual care.

Для цитирования: Vagedes Jan, Fazeli Aurelia, Boening Anna, Helmert Eduard, Berger Bettina, Martin David. Efficacy of rhythmical massage in comparison to heart rate variability biofeedback in patients with dysmenorrhea-A randomized, controlled trial.. Complementary therapies in medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.11.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.