MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.038

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric surgery · 2015

Post-ECMO chest tube placement: A propensity score-matched survival analysis.

Tashiro Jun, Perez Eduardo A, Lasko David S, Sola Juan E

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Severe morbidity and mortality has been reported from chest tube (CT) placement during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

METHODS

Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was analyzed for ECMO with CT placed <8days postcannulation (1997-2009).

RESULTS

Overall, 5884 patients were identified (213 CT) (56% male, 49% white), with a median (IQR) age at ECMO cannulation 7 (117)days, length of stay (LOS) 26 (35)days, and total charges (TC) 342,116 (409,573) USD. Diagnoses included congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) 16%, meconium aspiration (MA) 2%, pulmonary hypertension (PH) 13%, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) 41%, and cardiac (C) 29%. Survival was overall 57%, CDH 47%, MA 88%, PH 75%, RDS 57%, and C 52%. There were no differences in survival between CT and non-CT patients compared overall, or by diagnosis, or by age <30days, or by diagnosis and age <30days. Multivariate analysis and propensity score matching for all ages, or <30days of age by diagnosis showed no difference in survival between CT and non-CT patients.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of KID with correlative propensity score matching demonstrates no increased mortality in pediatric ECMO patients requiring CT placement.

Для цитирования: Tashiro Jun, Perez Eduardo A, Lasko David S, Sola Juan E. Post-ECMO chest tube placement: A propensity score-matched survival analysis.. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.038.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.