MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.06.015

Медицинская библиотека · American heart journal · 2023

Efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based triple antiplatelet therapy compared with clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 4 trial.

Park Soohyung, Rha Seung-Woon, Choi Byoung Geol, Kim Woohyeun, Choi Woong Gil, Lee Seung Jin, Lee Jae Beom, Park Ji Young, Park Sang Min, Jeong Myung Ho, Kim Yong Hoon, Her Ae-Young, Kim Min Woong, Chen Kang-Yin, Kim Bae Keun, Shin Eun-Seok, Seo Jae-Bin, Ahn Jihun, Choi Se Yeon, Byun Jae Kyeong, Cha Jin Ah, Hyun Su Jin, Choi Cheol Ung, Park Chang Gyu

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеКлиническое исследование IV фазыСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Previous studies reported that compared to conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT; aspirin + clopidogrel), triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT), involving the addition of cilostazol to DAT, had better clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the optimal duration of TAT is yet to be determined.

METHODS

In total, 985 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs) were prospectively enrolled in 15 PCI centers in South Korea and China. We randomly assigned patients into 3 groups: DAT (aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months), TAT 1M (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for 1 month), and TAT 6M (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for 6 months). The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as a composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint did not differ among the 3 groups (8.8% in DAT, 11.0% in TAT 1M, and 11.6% in TAT 6M; hazard ratio for TAT 1M vs DAT, 1.302; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.792-2.141; P = .297; hazard ratio for TAT 6M vs DAT, 1.358; 95% CI, 0.829-2.225; P = .225). With respect to in-hospital outcomes, more bleeding events occurred in the TAT group than in the DAT group (1.3% vs 4.7% vs 2.6%, P = .029), with no significant differences in major bleeding events. Additionally, the TAT group had a higher incidence of headaches (0% vs 1.6% vs 2.6%, P = .020).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of cilostazol to DAT did not reduce the incidence of 1-year MACEs compared with DAT alone. Instead, it may be associated with an increased risk of drug intolerance and side effects, including in-hospital bleeding and headaches.

Для цитирования: Park Soohyung, Rha Seung-Woon, Choi Byoung Geol, Kim Woohyeun, Choi Woong Gil, Lee Seung Jin, Lee Jae Beom, Park Ji Young, Park Sang Min, Jeong Myung Ho, Kim Yong Hoon, Her Ae-Young, Kim Min Woong, Chen Kang-Yin, Kim Bae Keun, Shin Eun-Seok, Seo Jae-Bin, Ahn Jihun, Choi Se Yeon, Byun Jae Kyeong, Cha Jin Ah, Hyun Su Jin, Choi Cheol Ung, Park Chang Gyu. Efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based triple antiplatelet therapy compared with clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 4 trial.. American heart journal. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.06.015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.