DOI 10.1097/ms9.0000000000001943
Richter supraumbilical hernia managed with invagination: a case report.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND
IMPORTANCE
Richter's hernia is an incarceration of the anti-mesenteric border of a segment of bowel through an abdominal wall defect. It primarily affects elderly individuals but can occur at any age, with a slightly increased incidence in females. The increase in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted procedures has led to a rise in Richter's hernias.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old male with a history of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and kidney transplantation presented with a 4-day history of supraumbilical swelling and abdominal pain. The swelling was irreducible and accompanied by mild tenderness, and local signs of inflammation were exhibited. Intraoperatively, a 1.5 cm hernia defect was found, with the sac containing omentum and a portion of bowel segment for which invagination with serosal closure with the Mayo double-breasting technique was done.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Richter's hernia presents with abdominal discomfort, bloating, nausea, and vomiting, with a notable feature being the delayed onset of symptoms due to its partial involvement of the bowel wall. Diagnosis can be achieved through a computed tomography (CT) scan or intraoperative exploration. Management of Richter hernia is contingent upon the patient's clinical condition, physical examination, and suspicion of strangulation.
CONCLUSION
Diagnosis of Richter's hernia demands higher suspicion, particularly in patients with predisposing factors like a history of minimally invasive surgery. Prompt surgical intervention is crucial for reducing mortality and enhancing prognosis, with invagination alone being adequate if ischaemia is confined and mesh placement is unnecessary.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.