MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.08.004

Медицинская библиотека · JACC. Heart failure · 2020

Estimating the Lifetime Benefits of Treatments for Heart Failure.

Ferreira João Pedro, Docherty Kieran F, Stienen Susan, Jhund Pardeep S, Claggett Brian L, Solomon Scott D, Petrie Mark C, Gregson John, Pocock Stuart J, Zannad Faiez, McMurray John J V

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This study compared ways of describing treatment effects. The objective was to better explain to clinicians and patients what they might expect from a given treatment, not only in terms of relative and absolute risk reduction, but also in projections of long-term survival.

BACKGROUND

The restricted mean survival time (RMST) can be used to estimate of long-term survival, providing a complementary approach to more conventional metrics (e.g., absolute and relative risk), which may suggest greater benefits of therapy in high-risk patients compared with low-risk patients.

METHODS

Relative and absolute risk, as well as the RMST, were calculated in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) trials.

RESULTS

As examples, in the RALES trial (more severe HFrEF), the treatment effect metrics for spironolactone versus placebo on heart failure hospitalization and/or cardiovascular death were a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5 to 0.77), number needed to treat = 9 (7 to 14), and age extension of event-free survival +1.1 years (-0.1 to + 2.3 years). The corresponding metrics for EMPHASIS-HF (eplerenone vs. placebo in less severe HFrEF) were 0.64 (0.54 to 0.75), 14 (1 to 22), and +2.9 (1.2 to 4.5). In patients in PARADIGM-HF aged younger than 65 years, the metrics for sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.88), 23 (15 to 44), and +1.7 (0.6 to 2.8) years; for those aged 65 years or older, the metrics were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.94), 29 (17 to 83), and +0.9 (0.2 to 1.6) years, which provided evidence of a greater potential life extension in younger patients. Similar observations were found for lower risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RMST event-free (and overall) survival estimates provided a complementary means of evaluating the effect of therapy in relation to age and risk. They also provided a clinically useful metric that should be routinely reported and used to explain the potential long-term benefits of a given treatment, especially to younger and less symptomatic patients.

Для цитирования: Ferreira João Pedro, Docherty Kieran F, Stienen Susan, Jhund Pardeep S, Claggett Brian L, Solomon Scott D, Petrie Mark C, Gregson John, Pocock Stuart J, Zannad Faiez, McMurray John J V. Estimating the Lifetime Benefits of Treatments for Heart Failure.. JACC. Heart failure. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.08.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.