MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/15569845241266527

Медицинская библиотека · Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024

Impella 5.5: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.

Valdes Carlos Alberto, Bilgili Ahmet, Reddy Akshay, Sharaf Omar, Jimenez-Contreras Fabian, Stinson Griffin, Ahmed Mustafa, Vilaro Juan, Parker Alex M, Al-Ani Mohammad Az, Demos Daniel, Aranda Juan, Bleiweis Mark, Beaver Thomas M, Jeng Eric I

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Impella 5.5 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) is a temporary mechanical circulatory support device used for patients in cardiogenic shock. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the device's clinical effectiveness, safety profile, patient outcomes, and relevant procedural considerations.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the PubMed/MEDLINE database. The search query included articles available from October 6, 2022, through January 13, 2023. Our initial search identified 75 studies. All records were screened by 2 independent reviewers using the Covidence software for adherence to our inclusion criteria, and 8 retrospective cohort studies were identified as appropriate for inclusion.

RESULTS

Across the included studies, the sample size ranged from 4 to 275, with predominantly male cohorts. Indications for Impella support varied, and the duration of support ranged from 9.8 to 70 days. Overall, Impella support appeared to be associated with favorable survival rates and manageable complications in various patient populations. Complications associated with Impella use included bleeding, stroke, and device malfunctions. Two studies compared prolonged and Food and Drug Administration-approved Impella support, showing similar outcomes and adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Impella 5.5 continues to be an attractive option for bridging patients to definitive therapy. Survival during and after Impella 5.5 was favorable for patients regardless of initial indication. However, device use was associated with several important complications, which calls for judicious use and a precontemplated exit strategy. Limitations of this literature review include biases inherent to the retrospective studies included, such as selection and publication bias.

Для цитирования: Valdes Carlos Alberto, Bilgili Ahmet, Reddy Akshay, Sharaf Omar, Jimenez-Contreras Fabian, Stinson Griffin, Ahmed Mustafa, Vilaro Juan, Parker Alex M, Al-Ani Mohammad Az, Demos Daniel, Aranda Juan, Bleiweis Mark, Beaver Thomas M, Jeng Eric I. Impella 5.5: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.. Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2024. DOI: 10.1177/15569845241266527.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.