Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi · 2024
[Effect of Training Data Differences on Accuracy in MR Image Generation Using Pix2pix].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsukano Masaru, Yamamoto Yasushi, Shirai Masato, Takamura Masahiro, Matsuo Kazuaki, Miyahara Yoshinori, Kaji Yasushi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Using a magnetic resonance (MR) image generation technique with deep learning, we elucidated whether changing the training data patterns affected image generation accuracy.
METHODS: The pix2pix training model generated T1-weighted images from T2-weighted images or FLAIR images. Head MR images obtained at our hospital were used in this study. We prepared 300 cases for each model and four training data patterns for each model (a: 150 cases for one MR system, b: 300 cases for one MR system, c: 150 cases and augmentation data for one MR system, and d: 300 cases for two MR systems). The extension data were images of 150 cases rotated in the XY plane. The similarity between the images generated by the training and evaluation data in each group was evaluated using the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM).
RESULTS: For both MR systems, the PSNR and SSIM were higher for training dataset b than training dataset a. The PSNR and SSIM were lower for training dataset d.
CONCLUSION: MR image generation accuracy varied among training data patterns.
METHODS: The pix2pix training model generated T1-weighted images from T2-weighted images or FLAIR images. Head MR images obtained at our hospital were used in this study. We prepared 300 cases for each model and four training data patterns for each model (a: 150 cases for one MR system, b: 300 cases for one MR system, c: 150 cases and augmentation data for one MR system, and d: 300 cases for two MR systems). The extension data were images of 150 cases rotated in the XY plane. The similarity between the images generated by the training and evaluation data in each group was evaluated using the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM).
RESULTS: For both MR systems, the PSNR and SSIM were higher for training dataset b than training dataset a. The PSNR and SSIM were lower for training dataset d.
CONCLUSION: MR image generation accuracy varied among training data patterns.