DOI 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.099
Impact of Pretransplant Panel-Reactive Antibody Level on Renal Graft Survival in Patients With a Negative Crossmatch and No Donor-Specific Antibody.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Patients with high panel-reactive antibody (PRA) levels before transplantation tend to remain on the waiting list longer when considering cadaveric donor transplantation and have worse outcomes than those with lower PRA levels. This study investigated the impact of the pretransplantation PRA level on rejection and graft survival after kidney transplantation in patients with a negative crossmatch (CXM(-)) and no donor-specific antibody (DSA(-)).
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed 513 recipients of kidney allograft treated from January 2009 to April 2013. Those who tested positive on crossmatching, had donor-specific antibodies, were ABO incompatible, or had no PRA level data were excluded (n = 130). The remaining patients were stratified into 3 groups according to their PRA levels: group I, PRA = 0 (314 [80.1%]); group II, PRA ≤50% (27 [7.2%]); and group III, PRA >50% (27 [7.2%]). Graft failure was defined as a return to dialysis, transplant nephrectomy, or death with a functioning kidney.
RESULTS
The mean patient follow-up was 30.4 ± 4.6 months. The rejection rate was 20.1% (group I, 18.5% [n = 58] vs group II, 23.8% [n = 10] vs group III, 33.3% [n = 9] [P = .053]). The graft failure rate was 21.7% (group I, 6.4% [n = 20] vs group II. 7.1% [n = 3] vs group III, 7.4% [n = 7] [P = .792]), and the 3-year graft survival rates were 96.3, 92.4, and 92.5%, respectively (P = .851).
CONCLUSIONS
The pretransplant PRA level was not significantly associated with graft survival in patients with CXM(-) and DSA(-). However, the rejection rate tended toward significance as the PRA level increased (P = .053).
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.