Neurology · 2018
Nomograms to predict naming decline after temporal lobe surgery in adults with epilepsy.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Busch Robyn M, Hogue Olivia, Kattan Michael W, Hamberger Marla, Drane Daniel L, Hermann Bruce, Kim Michelle, Ferguson Lisa, Bingaman William, Gonzalez-Martinez Jorge, Najm Imad M, Jehi Lara
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To develop and externally validate models to predict the probability of postoperative naming decline in adults following temporal lobe epilepsy surgery using easily accessible preoperative clinical predictors.
METHODS: In this retrospective, prediction model development study, multivariable models were developed in a cohort of 719 patients who underwent temporal lobe epilepsy surgery at Cleveland Clinic and externally validated in a cohort of 138 patients who underwent temporal lobe surgery at one of 3 epilepsy surgery centers in the United States (Columbia University Medical Center, Emory University School of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine).
RESULTS: The development cohort was 54% female with an average age at surgery of 36 years (SD 12). Twenty-six percent of this cohort experienced clinically relevant postoperative naming decline. The model included 5 variables: side of surgery, age at epilepsy onset, age at surgery, sex, and education. When applied to the external validation cohort, the model performed very well, with excellent calibration and a c statistic (reflecting discriminatory ability) of 0.81. A second model predicting moderate to severe postoperative naming decline included 3 variables: side of surgery, age at epilepsy onset, and preoperative naming score. This model generated a c statistic of 0.84 in the external validation cohort and showed good calibration.
CONCLUSION: Externally validated nomograms are provided in 2 easy-to-use formats (paper version and online calculator) clinicians can use to estimate the probability of naming decline in patients considering epilepsy surgery for treatment of pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy.
METHODS: In this retrospective, prediction model development study, multivariable models were developed in a cohort of 719 patients who underwent temporal lobe epilepsy surgery at Cleveland Clinic and externally validated in a cohort of 138 patients who underwent temporal lobe surgery at one of 3 epilepsy surgery centers in the United States (Columbia University Medical Center, Emory University School of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine).
RESULTS: The development cohort was 54% female with an average age at surgery of 36 years (SD 12). Twenty-six percent of this cohort experienced clinically relevant postoperative naming decline. The model included 5 variables: side of surgery, age at epilepsy onset, age at surgery, sex, and education. When applied to the external validation cohort, the model performed very well, with excellent calibration and a c statistic (reflecting discriminatory ability) of 0.81. A second model predicting moderate to severe postoperative naming decline included 3 variables: side of surgery, age at epilepsy onset, and preoperative naming score. This model generated a c statistic of 0.84 in the external validation cohort and showed good calibration.
CONCLUSION: Externally validated nomograms are provided in 2 easy-to-use formats (paper version and online calculator) clinicians can use to estimate the probability of naming decline in patients considering epilepsy surgery for treatment of pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy.