Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology · 2024
CytoLyt fixation impedes insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) immunoreactivity compared to formalin fixation.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Garlin-Politis Michelle, Upadhyay Baskota Swikrity, Picon Sarah, Collins Nikosa, Virk Renu Kaur, Cimic Adela, Yousefi Elham, Gonzalez Abel
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is an immunohistochemical marker commonly used to confirm cytomorphological concordant neuroendocrine tumors/carcinomas (NETs/NECs), demonstrating high utility in small samples. Previous reports have suggested comparable INSM1 staining in CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks and formalin-fixed surgical pathology specimens. This study aimed to assess INSM1 immunoreactivity using both fixation methods and investigate potential factors contributing to its variable expression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective query was performed (03/31/21-05/31/22) for NET/NEC cases that had both formalin- and CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks. We collected clinical data and reporting of immunostains for each case. INSM1 staining was evaluated in both fixation methods, and reported as positive, negative, or equivocal. Equivocal INSM1 staining was further scored as a percentage of 1%-100% and intensity of weak (faint staining), moderate (darker staining), and strong (dense staining).
RESULTS: Our search identified 20 cases from diverse body sites, including mediastinal lymph nodes (40%), pancreas (35%), lung (20%), and porta hepatis lymph nodes (5%). All cases exhibited a widespread positivity (over 90%) in formalin-fixed cell blocks. In contrast, CytoLyt fixed cells showed a negative stain in 65% of cases and 30% exhibited an equivocal positivity.
CONCLUSIONS: While INSM1 is previously reported as a sensitive (75%-100%) and specific (82.7%-100%) marker for NET/NECs, our study found a reduced immunohistochemical staining in CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks. Consequently, false negative INSM1 immunohistochemical results in CytoLyt-fixed cell block material may pose a pitfall in the diagnosis of NET/NEC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective query was performed (03/31/21-05/31/22) for NET/NEC cases that had both formalin- and CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks. We collected clinical data and reporting of immunostains for each case. INSM1 staining was evaluated in both fixation methods, and reported as positive, negative, or equivocal. Equivocal INSM1 staining was further scored as a percentage of 1%-100% and intensity of weak (faint staining), moderate (darker staining), and strong (dense staining).
RESULTS: Our search identified 20 cases from diverse body sites, including mediastinal lymph nodes (40%), pancreas (35%), lung (20%), and porta hepatis lymph nodes (5%). All cases exhibited a widespread positivity (over 90%) in formalin-fixed cell blocks. In contrast, CytoLyt fixed cells showed a negative stain in 65% of cases and 30% exhibited an equivocal positivity.
CONCLUSIONS: While INSM1 is previously reported as a sensitive (75%-100%) and specific (82.7%-100%) marker for NET/NECs, our study found a reduced immunohistochemical staining in CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks. Consequently, false negative INSM1 immunohistochemical results in CytoLyt-fixed cell block material may pose a pitfall in the diagnosis of NET/NEC.