MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.11607/ijp.8895

Медицинская библиотека · The International journal of prosthodontics · 2025

Effect of Using Cheek Retractors on Patient Satisfaction and Trueness of Peripheral Borders in Maxillary Digital Scans for Totally Edentulous Patients: An In Vivo Study.

Saadeh Carmen, Tohme Hani, Lawand Ghida, Khoury Nicolas, Yared Carole

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of cheek retractors on the accuracy of capturing peripheral borders in totally edentulous digital scans by comparing the conventional impression technique to digital scans made using two different cheek retractors.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

In total, 16 edentulous maxillary impressions were made using three techniques: (1) the conventional impression technique, using modeling thermoplastic compound and zinc oxide eugenol paste; (2) the digital intraoral scanning technique, using the DIO scan retractor (DIO); and (3) the digital intraoral scanning technique, using the Brånemark lip retractor (BRAN). The control impressions of each patient were poured, scanned using a desktop scanner, and transferred into a 3D-analysis software. DIO and BRAN groups were scanned using an intraoral scanner, imported, and superimposed, using best-fit algorithm on the corresponding control. The root mean square for the whole surface and for particular regions of interest were calculated to assess the degree of trueness. Patient perception of the impression techniques was the secondary outcome. Statistical analyses were performed using one-sample t test and Wilcoxon test (α = .05).

RESULTS

Significant discrepancies were found for BRAN and DIO compared to the control. No significant discrepancies were found when comparing RMS of BRAN and DIO at different regions. Scan retractors had a significant impact on patient satisfaction, with patients preferring DIO.

CONCLUSIONS

Edentulous intraoral scans made using cheek retractors had similar deviations when compared to each other but diverged from the conventional impression in the edentulous maxilla. Patient preference for intraoral scans over conventional impressions was confirmed. The use of different retraction methods during intraoral scanning of totally edentulous maxillary arches does not affect the peripheral border registration.

Для цитирования: Saadeh Carmen, Tohme Hani, Lawand Ghida, Khoury Nicolas, Yared Carole. Effect of Using Cheek Retractors on Patient Satisfaction and Trueness of Peripheral Borders in Maxillary Digital Scans for Totally Edentulous Patients: An In Vivo Study.. The International journal of prosthodontics. 2025. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.8895.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.