MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Archivos espanoles de urologia · 2015

Substitution urethroplasty. Long term follow up results in a group of 50 patients.

Lozano José Luis, Arruza Antonio

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To assess the results of substitution urethroplasty after a long follow-up in a group of 50 patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with diagnosis of urethral stricture treated by augmentation techniques in the period 1999-2009. We included patients with penile and bulbar urethral stricture and, penile skin or oral mucosa as substitute tissue type. Urethral strictures of the meatus or fossa navicularis and posterior urethra, and other endoscopic or surgical procedures were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included. Penile skin was used in 26 cases and buccal mucosa in 24. The average follow-up was 108 months. Recurrence rate was 25% in the cases in which oral mucosa was used as substitute tissue and 30.7% in the penile skin group. Of the 14 cases with recurrence of the stricture, 13 (92%) did so in the first five years of follow-up. Only one case was a recurrent stricture after six years of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence of the stricture after augmentation urethroplasty occurs, in the majority of cases, in the first five years. After this period of time recurrence is very rare. Oral mucosa showed better results as substitute tissue in the urethral stricture surgery.

Для цитирования: Lozano José Luis, Arruza Antonio. Substitution urethroplasty. Long term follow up results in a group of 50 patients.. Archivos espanoles de urologia. 2015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.