MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/cam4.71295

Медицинская библиотека · Cancer medicine · 2025

Efficacy and Safety of EGF/EGFR Vaccines in EGFR-Driven Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled and Single-Arm Studies.

Chen Fei, Bai Ling, Cui Jiuwei

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Despite multiple clinical trials, the benefits and safety of epidermal growth factor (EGF)/EGF receptor (EGFR) vaccines in EGFR-driven solid tumors remain unclear due to small sample sizes and heterogeneous study designs. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate their efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We conducted pairwise and single-arm meta-analyses following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251026774). Searches in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library identified 26 trials (2701 participants). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with secondary analyses of progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Statistical analyses were performed using R software, with fixed or random-effects models per heterogeneity (I2).

RESULTS

Compared with best supportive care, vaccine monotherapy significantly improved long-term OS in NSCLC and GBM (3-year OR = 2.16, 5-year OR = 3.20) and prolonged median OS in NSCLC (HR = 0.76). In single-arm studies, NSCLC patients receiving vaccine monotherapy had a 1-year OS of 64% (75% in first-line maintenance), with an ORR of 2% and DCR of 31%. For GBM, vaccine combination therapy improved 3-year OS (OR = 2.42) and 2-year PFS (OR = 1.63) versus standard therapy. Single-arm combination analyses showed an overall 1-year OS of 84%, ORR of 42%, and DCR of 87%, while NSCLC first-line combination achieved a 1-year OS of 85% and DCR of 89%. Notably, EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients had a pooled ORR of 65% and DCR of 98%. Common TRAEs were grade 1-2 (injection site reactions, fever, headache, and vomiting), and combination therapy had no new or severe toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

EGF/EGFR vaccines may improve survival in EGFR-driven solid tumors, particularly NSCLC and GBM. Monotherapy enables long-term disease control, and combination therapy enhances efficacy without added toxicity, supporting further clinical validation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420251026774.

Для цитирования: Chen Fei, Bai Ling, Cui Jiuwei. Efficacy and Safety of EGF/EGFR Vaccines in EGFR-Driven Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled and Single-Arm Studies.. Cancer medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.71295.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.