MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/10790268.2008.11760713

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2008

Evaluation of the effects of compression stockings using venous plethysmography in persons with spinal cord injury.

Rimaud Diana, Boissier Christian, Calmels Paul

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of graduated compression stockings (GCS) on the properties of the venous vascular system, as characterized by venous capacitance (VC) and venous outflow (VO), in the lower extremities of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), according to injury level.

METHODS

Nine male subjects with SCI (5 with low paraplegia [LP], 4 with high paraplegia [HP]) performed 2 plethysmography tests: with and without graduated compression knee-length stockings (pressure of 21 mm/Hg). The VC, VO, and cardiovascular parameters (heart rate and blood pressure) were evaluated with and without GCS.

RESULTS

The VC and VO were lower in patients with HP than in those with LP. For all subjects, VC was significantly lower (-14%) with GCS than without (1.77 +/- 1.18 vs 1.53 +/- 1.09 vol%, P < 0.01). On the contrary, VO did not differ significantly when wearing or not wearing GCS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that 21-mm/Hg knee-length GCS are sufficient to prevent venous distension in individuals with SCI, even those with longstanding paraplegia, by significantly decreasing venous capacitance. This intervention may help to prevent deep vein thrombosis.

Для цитирования: Rimaud Diana, Boissier Christian, Calmels Paul. Evaluation of the effects of compression stockings using venous plethysmography in persons with spinal cord injury.. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2008. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2008.11760713.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.