In vivo (Athens, Greece) · 2023
Bio-characteristics and Efficacy Analysis of Biodegradable Poly Dioxanone Dermal Filler in a Mouse Model and Humans.
Источник пометил эту публикацию как отозванную.
СтатьяОтозванная публикацияНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhou Shu-Yi, Kang So Min, Gu Yeon Ju, Zhang Xin Rui, Yon Dong Keon, Shin Byung Ho, Ham Jung Ryul, Lee Won Ku, Jeong Je Geun, Kwon Han Jin, Heo Chan-Yeong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIM: This research investigated the biophysical properties, safety, and efficacy of polydioxanone (PDO) filler compared to poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), and hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers. In both mouse and human skin models, a novel collagen stimulation was compared with hyaluronic acid filler.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electron microscope was used to capture images of the solid particle microsphere shape. Moreover, animal models named SKH1-Hrhr were used to assess the 12-week persistence of PDO, PLLA, or PCL filler. H&E and Sirus Red staining were used to compare collagen density. Five participants in the clinical trial received three injections in the dermis over an eight-month period. Skin density, wrinkles, and gloss were evaluated using DUB® skin scanner, Antera 3D CS, Mark-Vu, and Skin gloss meter after injection to assess the efficacy of fillers.
RESULTS: PDO microspheres had uneven surfaces and were spherical and consistent in size. In comparison to other fillers, the PDO filler demonstrated complete biodegradability in just 12 weeks and better neocollagenesis, and a lower inflammatory response than the HA filler. After three injections, the human body assay showed a significant improvement in skin gloss, wrinkles, and density.
CONCLUSION: In comparison to PCL and PLLA, PDO filler demonstrated a comparable volume increase rate and better biodegradability. Furthermore, although its physical characteristics are similar to those of a solid, PDO has the advantage of being more organically spread. In photoaging mice, PDO fillers are thought to offer equivalent or superior anti-wrinkle and anti-aging effects to PBS, PCL, and PLLA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electron microscope was used to capture images of the solid particle microsphere shape. Moreover, animal models named SKH1-Hrhr were used to assess the 12-week persistence of PDO, PLLA, or PCL filler. H&E and Sirus Red staining were used to compare collagen density. Five participants in the clinical trial received three injections in the dermis over an eight-month period. Skin density, wrinkles, and gloss were evaluated using DUB® skin scanner, Antera 3D CS, Mark-Vu, and Skin gloss meter after injection to assess the efficacy of fillers.
RESULTS: PDO microspheres had uneven surfaces and were spherical and consistent in size. In comparison to other fillers, the PDO filler demonstrated complete biodegradability in just 12 weeks and better neocollagenesis, and a lower inflammatory response than the HA filler. After three injections, the human body assay showed a significant improvement in skin gloss, wrinkles, and density.
CONCLUSION: In comparison to PCL and PLLA, PDO filler demonstrated a comparable volume increase rate and better biodegradability. Furthermore, although its physical characteristics are similar to those of a solid, PDO has the advantage of being more organically spread. In photoaging mice, PDO fillers are thought to offer equivalent or superior anti-wrinkle and anti-aging effects to PBS, PCL, and PLLA.