Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology · 2004

Duraplasty: our current experience.

Caroli Emanuela, Rocchi Giovanni, Salvati Maurizio, Delfini Roberto

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A large variety of biologic and artificial materials have been suggested as dural substitutes. However, no ideal material for dural repair in neurosurgical procedures has been identified. The authors report their experience with Tutoplast processed dura and pericardium.

METHODS

This study is designed to evaluate Tutoplast dura and pericardium. The study population was composed of 250 consecutive patients who underwent cerebral duraplasty with these homologous materials between 1996 and 1998. The average follow-up was 5.4 years.

RESULTS

We have observed only four complications with uncertain relationship with the dural implant. These resulted in complete recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

We support the efficacy and safety of this natural dural substitute treated with Tutoplast method.

Для цитирования: Caroli Emanuela, Rocchi Giovanni, Salvati Maurizio, Delfini Roberto. Duraplasty: our current experience.. Surgical neurology. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(03)00524-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Adult Aged Arachnoid Cysts Biocompatible Materials Cavernous Sinus Central Nervous System Neoplasms Cerebellar Neoplasms Cranial Fossa, Posterior Dura Mater Female Hemangioblastoma Humans Male Melanoma Middle Aged Pericardium Prostheses and Implants Prosthesis Implantation Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Подготовка и перевод публикации

Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление

Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.