MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/02699052.2017.1376754

Медицинская библиотека · Brain injury · 2017

Traumatic axonal injury despite clinical phenotype of mild traumatic brain injury: a case report.

Jang Sung Ho, Lee Han Do

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

We report on a patient who suffered traumatic axonal injury (TAI) of various neural tracts despite airbag deployment following mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), which was demonstrated by diffusion tensor tractography (DTT).

CASE DESCRIPTION: A 58-year-old female patient suffered from head trauma resulting from an in-car traffic accident. At the time of head trauma, her head and face hit the deployed airbag after flexion-hyperextension-rotation injury. The patient's Glasgow Coma Scale score was 15. Since the day of head trauma, she began to feel headache and upper back pain at the mid-thoracic area. At 7 days after onset, she began to feel pain on the left hand, which spread to the right hand and leg: throbbing and cold pain without allodynia or hyperalgesia (visual analogue scale score: 5). She also felt mild weakness of all four extremities and mild memory impairment. On 4-week DTT, the corticospinal tract showed partial tearing at the subcortical white matter level in both hemispheres . The right fornical crus and right anterior cingulum were discontinued, and narrowing and partial tearing were observed in both spinothalamic tracts.

CONCLUSIONS

TAI of four kinds of neural tracts was demonstrated in a patient with mild TBI despite airbag deployment, using DTT.

Для цитирования: Jang Sung Ho, Lee Han Do. Traumatic axonal injury despite clinical phenotype of mild traumatic brain injury: a case report.. Brain injury. 2017. DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1376754.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.