MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5664/jcsm.11898

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025

Multisetting evaluation of Watch-PAT in obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Stafford Patrick L, Roth Robert, Ferguson John, Bilchick Kenneth C, Darby Andrew E, Mazimba Sula, Mehta Nishaki, Davis Eric M, Bonner Heather, Cho Yeilim, Logan Jeongok, Sobremonte-King Michelle, Kwon Younghoon

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVES

Patients with atrial fibrillation have elevated risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A peripheral arterial tonometry-based device, the Watch-PAT (WP) has been increasingly used as a home OSA test. We conducted a multisetting evaluation of WP in OSA diagnosis by comparing results from in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG), in-laboratory WP, and home WP in patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Patients with atrial fibrillation underwent an in-laboratory PSG with concurrent in-laboratory WP and 2 consecutive nights of home WP. OSA was categorized into no OSA, mild, moderate, and severe OSA by apnea-hypopnea index (< 5, ≥ 5 to < 15, ≥ 15 to < 29, ≥ 30 events/h). The primary outcome was OSA severity agreement between in-laboratory PSG vs home WP. Secondary outcomes included the agreement between in-laboratory PSG vs in-laboratory WP, as well as in-laboratory WP vs home WP. Night-to-night variability of consecutive nights of home WP was also evaluated. Results were expressed by Cohen's kappa (κ) for apnea-hypopnea index scoring rules 1a and 1b.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients were included for analysis. There was slight and fair agreement between in-laboratory PSG and home WP (κ = 0.15, 0.40 for score rule 1a and 1b, respectively), substantial agreement between in-laboratory PSG vs in-laboratory WP (κ = 0.63, 0.71), moderate agreement between in-laboratory WP and home WP (κ = 0.59, 0.59), and almost perfect agreement between first night home WP and second night home WP (κ = 0.87, 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate overall slight to fair agreement between home WP vs in-laboratory PSG, suggesting inadequate performance against the standard reference test. This should be considered when interpreting the results of home WP. Other evaluations demonstrated moderate agreement for in-laboratory WP and home WP in the classification of OSA severity, substantial agreement between in-laboratory PSG and in-laboratory WP, and almost perfect agreement in the comparison of both home WP.

CITATION: Stafford PL, Roth R, Ferguson J, et al. Multisetting evaluation of Watch-PAT in obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(12):2139-2154.

Для цитирования: Stafford Patrick L, Roth Robert, Ferguson John, Bilchick Kenneth C, Darby Andrew E, Mazimba Sula, Mehta Nishaki, Davis Eric M, Bonner Heather, Cho Yeilim, Logan Jeongok, Sobremonte-King Michelle, Kwon Younghoon. Multisetting evaluation of Watch-PAT in obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis in patients with atrial fibrillation.. Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.11898.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.