MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/won.0b013e3181aaf446

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society · 2009

Prevalence of urinary incontinence in a community sample from the city of São Paulo.

Jesus Menezes Maria Aparecida, Hashimoto Soraya Yumi, de Gouveia Santos Vera Lúcia Conceição

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) in a community sample from the city of São Paulo.

METHODS

This epidemiological survey was conducted at a family health program in São Paulo, Brazil, using randomized sampling. Data were collected by interviewing residents and were analyzed by Pearson's correlation coefficients, chi-square tests, and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy (10.7%) of the 657 subjects currently presented UI, including 50.7% with sporadic UI and 74.3% with UI upon moderate efforts. Ninety-three percent woke up during the night, 43.7% maintained continence until the bathroom, 63.4% had a sensation of wetness, and 77.5% reported no use of any continence aids. Female gender, advanced age, gynecologic or urologic surgery, dysuria, and urinary tract infection were correlated with UI (P < .001; r = 0.572).

CONCLUSION

The overall prevalence of UI was found to be high and was comparable to results from multiple countries.

Для цитирования: Jesus Menezes Maria Aparecida, Hashimoto Soraya Yumi, de Gouveia Santos Vera Lúcia Conceição. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in a community sample from the city of São Paulo.. Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 2009. DOI: 10.1097/won.0b013e3181aaf446.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.