Ophthalmology · 2002
A distinctive form of congenital stationary night blindness with cone ON-pathway dysfunction.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barnes Claire S, Alexander Kenneth R, Fishman Gerald A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To characterize a distinctive form of congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB).
DESIGN: Observational case report.
PARTICIPANTS: A 30-year-old male with a history of night blindness, several members of his family, a patient with "complete" congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB1), and groups of age-similar control subjects.
METHODS: Rod-system function was evaluated by measuring psychophysical dark-adapted thresholds, by recording dark-adapted electroretinograms (ERGs), and by fundus reflectometry. Cone-system function was evaluated by recording light-adapted ERGs, including those to sawtooth flicker, and by recording light-adapted visually evoked potentials (VEPs) to luminance increments and decrements.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dark-adapted thresholds, ERGs, rhodopsin double densities, Goldmann visual fields, and VEPs.
RESULTS: The patient's visual acuity, visual fields, and color vision were normal. His peripheral dark-adapted thresholds were rod-mediated but elevated by approximately 3 log units above normal. Rhodopsin double density and bleaching recovery were normal. His dark-adapted maximal-flash ERG showed a "negative" waveform, in which the b-wave was more reduced in amplitude than the a-wave, although the a-wave amplitude was also reduced. The rod photoreceptors contributed to the patient's dark-adapted ERGs, as illustrated by the unequal responses to cone-matched stimuli. The patient's cone-mediated thresholds for long-wavelength stimuli were within the normal range. However, his light-adapted brief-flash b-wave was abnormal in amplitude and implicit time. Selective abnormalities of the ON responses of the cone system were apparent in the patient's reduced b-wave amplitude to rapid-on flicker with a normal response to rapid-off flicker, and his prolonged VEP latencies to increments but not to decrements.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall pattern of findings distinguishes this patient from previously described forms of CSNB. The results suggest that two factors likely contribute to the patient's night blindness: (1) a rod phototransduction defect and (2) a postreceptoral defect. The results also indicate dysfunction within the cone ON pathway.
DESIGN: Observational case report.
PARTICIPANTS: A 30-year-old male with a history of night blindness, several members of his family, a patient with "complete" congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB1), and groups of age-similar control subjects.
METHODS: Rod-system function was evaluated by measuring psychophysical dark-adapted thresholds, by recording dark-adapted electroretinograms (ERGs), and by fundus reflectometry. Cone-system function was evaluated by recording light-adapted ERGs, including those to sawtooth flicker, and by recording light-adapted visually evoked potentials (VEPs) to luminance increments and decrements.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dark-adapted thresholds, ERGs, rhodopsin double densities, Goldmann visual fields, and VEPs.
RESULTS: The patient's visual acuity, visual fields, and color vision were normal. His peripheral dark-adapted thresholds were rod-mediated but elevated by approximately 3 log units above normal. Rhodopsin double density and bleaching recovery were normal. His dark-adapted maximal-flash ERG showed a "negative" waveform, in which the b-wave was more reduced in amplitude than the a-wave, although the a-wave amplitude was also reduced. The rod photoreceptors contributed to the patient's dark-adapted ERGs, as illustrated by the unequal responses to cone-matched stimuli. The patient's cone-mediated thresholds for long-wavelength stimuli were within the normal range. However, his light-adapted brief-flash b-wave was abnormal in amplitude and implicit time. Selective abnormalities of the ON responses of the cone system were apparent in the patient's reduced b-wave amplitude to rapid-on flicker with a normal response to rapid-off flicker, and his prolonged VEP latencies to increments but not to decrements.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall pattern of findings distinguishes this patient from previously described forms of CSNB. The results suggest that two factors likely contribute to the patient's night blindness: (1) a rod phototransduction defect and (2) a postreceptoral defect. The results also indicate dysfunction within the cone ON pathway.