MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0194-5998(03)00521-7

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2003

Endoscopic repair of large skull base defects after powered sinus surgery.

Church Christopher A, Chiu Alexander G, Vaughan Winston C

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the management of patients with large skull base defects (> 2 cm) and intracranial injury caused by powered endoscopic sinus surgery. Study design and setting All patients treated for postendoscopic sinus surgery skull base injury over a 4-year period were reviewed.

RESULTS

Three patients with skull base defects greater than 2 cm in size and associated intracranial injury from powered ESS were identified. All patients presented with active cerebrospinal fluid leaks. CT scans showed intracranial injury and pathology reports revealed brain tissue removal. Using image-guided endoscopic techniques, all defects were addressed with multilayer repair. Closure was achieved in all patients on the first attempt, with an average follow-up of 27 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of powered instrumentation along the skull base can be dangerous and can result in extensive skull base defects with associated loss of dura and gray matter. Large ethmoid roof defects and significant intracranial injury, however, are not absolute contraindications to endoscopic repair.

Для цитирования: Church Christopher A, Chiu Alexander G, Vaughan Winston C. Endoscopic repair of large skull base defects after powered sinus surgery.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0194-5998(03)00521-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.