MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.36519/idcm.2023.291

Медицинская библиотека · Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2023

Is There a Role for Dark Field Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Lyme Disease?A Narrative Review.

Önal Uğur, Saraç-Pektaş Fatma, Sağlık İmran

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The diagnosis of Lyme disease is becoming more common in Turkey. Nonetheless, some physicians are not aware of the diagnostic principles that should be followed when faced with a suspected patient and could use tests that are not recommended, such as darkfield microscopy. Dark field microscopy is a diagnostic technique to visualize the spirochetes that cause Lyme disease; however, it is not recommended for the diagnosis of Lyme disease. One of the main limitations of dark field microscopy is its low sensitivity. Another limitation is its high false-positivity rate, as other microorganisms and cellular debris can be mistaken for spirochetes, leading to a misdiagnosis thatmay result in unnecessary treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to review the literature on the role of dark field microscopy as a diagnostic method for Lyme disease and inform physicians about recommended approaches in line with the recommendations of national or international guidelines. An electronic search of Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) search terms: Lyme borreliosis, Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, diagnosis, and microscopy. With this narrative review, we aimed to inform physicians better and improve patient care for patients with suspected Lyme disease.

Для цитирования: Önal Uğur, Saraç-Pektaş Fatma, Sağlık İmran. Is There a Role for Dark Field Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Lyme Disease?A Narrative Review.. Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology. 2023. DOI: 10.36519/idcm.2023.291.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.