DOI 10.1016/j.jmii.2019.03.007
The association of pili with the emergence and replacement of the major antibiotic resistant pneumococcal clones.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of pilus islet 1 (PI-1) and to determine its clade type in pneumococcal isolates with reduced susceptibility to penicillin (penicillin non-susceptible pneumococci - PNSP) and/or resistant to macrolides isolated prior to and after the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) in the Czech Republic.
METHODS
Clinical isolates of serotypes 9V (n = 68) and 19A (n = 89) were examined. Isolates were characterised by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The presence of PI-1 was determined by screening for the sortase B, C, and D genes located within PI-1. In the presence of PI-1 pilus, clade types were classified by PCR.
RESULTS
In the pre-PCV period (2000-2007), the prevalence of PNSP was 3.9% and 2.7% of isolates were resistant to erythromycin. During 2012-2015 (post-PCV period), the rates of PNSP remained stable (3.6%), but resistance to erythromycin increased to 8.3%. While in 2000-2007, resistance to antibiotics was associated mainly with serotype 9V, in 2012-2015, it was replaced by serotype 19A. PI-1 positive isolates were seen in both serotypes. All isolates (68) of serotype 9V belonged to the Spain9V-3 (CC156) clone and carried PI-1 of clade type I while 96.5% (56/58) of isolates of 19A serotype belonged to the Netherlands15B-37 (CC199) clone and carried PI-1 of clade type II.
CONCLUSIONS
Both major antibiotic resistant clones carried PI-1, although they differ in the clade type. Thus the role of PI-1 should be evaluated in further studies and potentially considered in the spread of antibiotic resistant clones.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.