MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.108

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric surgery · 2019

Pedicled jejunal interposition for long gap esophageal atresia.

Platt Esther, McNally Janet, Cusick Eleri

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) represents 10% of all esophageal atresias but can be complex to manage. Jejunal interposition (JI) has been recommended as the operative management of choice when esophageal ends cannot be opposed. We report our experience using the pedicled jejunal interposition technique with comparison to patients undergoing primary repair of LGEA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of all patients managed for LGEA at our unit between 2003 and 2017 with comparison between pedicled jejunal interposition and primary repair.

RESULTS

10 patients were treated with pedicled jejunal interposition and 9 patients underwent primary repair (including one Foker procedure performed elsewhere). Patient demographics and short term outcomes were similar between the two groups, but less anastomotic stricturing and gastroesophageal reflux were observed in the JI group.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest published series of pedicled jejunal interposition from the UK. Our results support continued use of this procedure with good long term graft function. It is our recommendation that pedicled interposition grafts are used in all patients requiring extensive dissection or tension to achieve opposition for primary repair.

TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Для цитирования: Platt Esther, McNally Janet, Cusick Eleri. Pedicled jejunal interposition for long gap esophageal atresia.. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.108.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.