MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/1413-785220162402154682

Медицинская библиотека · Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2016

ASSESSMENT OF REPRODUCIBILITY OF SANDERS CLASSIFICATION FOR CALCANEAL FRACTURES.

Piovesana Lucas Gonzaga, Lopes Hériston Cristovam, Pacca Daniel Moreira, Ninomiya André Felipe, Dinato Mauro César Mattos E, Pagnano Rodrigo Gonçalves

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

: To assess intra- and interobserver reproducibility of Sanders Classification System of calcaneal fractures among experienced and less experienced observers.

METHODS

: Forty-six CT scans of intra-articular calcaneal fractures were reviewed. Four observers, two with ten years of experience in foot and ankle surgery and two third-year residents in Orthopedics and Traumatology classified the fractures on two separate occasions three weeks apart from each other. The intra and inter-observer reliability was analyzed using the Kappa index.

RESULTS

: There was good intraobserver reliability for the two experienced observers and one less experienced observer (Kappa values 0.640, 0.632 and 0.629, respectively). The interobserver reliability was fair between the experienced observers (Kappa = 0.289) and moderate among the less experienced observers (Kappa = 0.527).

CONCLUSIONS

: The Sanders Classification System showed good intraobserver reliability, but interobserver reproducibility below the ideal level, both among experienced and less experienced observers. Level of Evidence III, Diagnostic Studies.

Для цитирования: Piovesana Lucas Gonzaga, Lopes Hériston Cristovam, Pacca Daniel Moreira, Ninomiya André Felipe, Dinato Mauro César Mattos E, Pagnano Rodrigo Gonçalves. ASSESSMENT OF REPRODUCIBILITY OF SANDERS CLASSIFICATION FOR CALCANEAL FRACTURES.. Acta ortopedica brasileira. 2016. DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220162402154682.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.