MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.rec.2020.04.016

Медицинская библиотека · Revista espanola de cardiologia (English ed.) · 2020

Noninferiority of heart failure nurse titration versus heart failure cardiologist titration. ETIFIC multicenter randomized trial.

Oyanguren Juana, Garcia-Garrido Lluisa, Nebot-Margalef Magdalena, Latorre-García Pedro, Torcal-Laguna Jesús, Comín-Colet Josep, Roure Julia, González-Costello José, Manito Nicolás, García-Pinilla José M, Sánchez-Paule Yolanda, Varela-Román Alfonso, Moure María, Segovia-Cubero Javier, Soria Teresa, Arana-Arri Eunate, Lekuona Iñaki, Steering Committee on behalf of the ETIFIC research team group

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеEquivalence TrialПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVES

Beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors), angiotensin-II-receptor-blockers (ARB), and mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists decrease mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in HF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The effect is dose-dependent. Careful titration is recommended. However, suboptimal doses are common in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of dose titration of the aforementioned drugs by HF nurses vs HF cardiologists.

METHODS

ETIFIC was a multicenter (n=20) noninferiority randomized controlled open label trial. A total of 320 hospitalized patients with new-onset HF, reduced ejection fraction and New York Heart Association II-III, without beta-blocker contraindications were randomized 1:1 in blocks of 4 patients each stratified by hospital: 164 to HF nurse titration vs 156 to HF cardiologist titration (144 vs 145 analyzed). The primary endpoint was the beta-blocker mean relative dose (% of target dose) achieved at 4 months. Secondary endpoints included ACE inhibitors, ARB, and mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists mean relative doses, associated variables, adverse events, and clinical outcomes at 6 months.

RESULTS

The mean±standard deviation relative doses achieved by HF nurses vs HF cardiologists were as follows: beta-blockers 71.09%±31.49% vs 56.29%±31.32%, with a difference of 14.8% (95%CI, 7.5-22.1), P <.001; ACE inhibitors 72.61%±29.80% vs 56.13%±30.37%, P <.001; ARB 44.48%±33.47% vs 43.51%±33.69%, P=.93; and mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists 71%±32.12% vs 70.47%±29.78%, P=.86; mean±standard deviation visits were 6.41±2.82 vs 2.81±1.58, P <.001, while the number (%) of adverse events were 34 (23.6) vs 30 (20.7), P=.55; and at 6 months HF hospitalizations were 1 (0.69) vs 9 (5.51), P=.01.

CONCLUSIONS

ETIFIC is the first multicenter randomized trial to demonstrate the noninferiority of HF specialist-nurse titration vs HF cardiologist titration. Moreover, HF nurses achieved higher beta-blocker/ACE inhibitors doses, with more outpatient visits and fewer HF hospitalizations. Trial registry number: NCT02546856.

Для цитирования: Oyanguren Juana, Garcia-Garrido Lluisa, Nebot-Margalef Magdalena, Latorre-García Pedro, Torcal-Laguna Jesús, Comín-Colet Josep, Roure Julia, González-Costello José, Manito Nicolás, García-Pinilla José M, Sánchez-Paule Yolanda, Varela-Román Alfonso, Moure María, Segovia-Cubero Javier, Soria Teresa, Arana-Arri Eunate, Lekuona Iñaki, Steering Committee on behalf of the ETIFIC research team group. Noninferiority of heart failure nurse titration versus heart failure cardiologist titration. ETIFIC multicenter randomized trial.. Revista espanola de cardiologia (English ed.). 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.04.016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.