MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/aej.70097

Медицинская библиотека · Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026

Teaching Responsible Innovation in Endodontics: A Pedagogical Framework for Long-Term Clinical Success: A Narrative Review.

Turky Mohammed, Abbott Paul V

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This review explores the responsible innovation concept in endodontics, emphasising its educational implications, biological accountability in clinical outcomes and a framework to guide everyday practice. Responsible innovation in endodontics must transcend mere technical advancement; it demands a comprehensive critical appraisal of practices, ethical awareness and a stewardship of long-term patient outcomes. Educational frameworks that prioritise reflective practice and encourage practitioners to continuously assess and refine their methodologies are essential. Additionally, a focus on biological plausibility and recognition of delayed identification of unfavourable outcomes is crucial. Failing to incorporate these principles may allow suboptimal innovations to persist within the field, potentially compromising patient safety and treatment effectiveness. Teaching responsible innovation should be a central objective in postgraduate endodontic education. By aligning innovative practices with long-term biological outcomes, ethical standards and societal expectations, the endodontic profession can better maintain its credibility while enhancing the quality of patient care.

Для цитирования: Turky Mohammed, Abbott Paul V. Teaching Responsible Innovation in Endodontics: A Pedagogical Framework for Long-Term Clinical Success: A Narrative Review.. Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/aej.70097.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.