MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.21873/anticanres.12565

Медицинская библиотека · Anticancer research · 2018

Recent Trends in HPV Infection and Type Distribution in Greece.

Argyri Elena, Tsimplaki Elpida, Papatheodorou Dimitrios, Daskalopoulou Dimitra, Panotopoulou Efstathia

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study gives an insight into recent trends for Human papillomavirus (HPV)-specific infection and its fluctuation over the years 2011-2016.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A total of 2,417 Caucasian women between the age of 18 and 71 years underwent their annual gynaecologic examination at the Outpatient Gynaecological Clinic in the study period.

RESULTS

Overall HPV prevalence was 43.9%, and high-risk HPV accounted for 31.3%. HPV16 was the most common high-risk type followed by HPV51 and HPV31. HPV positivity was higher in those with low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) than in women with a normal cytological test. HPV infection was highest in 2011.The prevalence of single infections remained higher than multiple infections over the entire study period. HPV16 prevalence was very high in the first years of the study and HPV18 exhibited highest prevalence in 2011. Younger women exhibited a significant increase in HPV infection from 2014. Overall HPV infection decreased over the study period.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that HPV vaccination might reduce the frequency of HSILs and cervical cancer and are useful for the development of a national screening programme.

Для цитирования: Argyri Elena, Tsimplaki Elpida, Papatheodorou Dimitrios, Daskalopoulou Dimitra, Panotopoulou Efstathia. Recent Trends in HPV Infection and Type Distribution in Greece.. Anticancer research. 2018. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12565.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.