MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Archivos espanoles de urologia · 2002

[Treatment of urinary stress incontinence using a laparoscopic technique].

Hernández Fernández Carlos, de Palacio España Andrés, Escribano Patiño Gregorio, Díez Cordero Jose María, Bielsa Carrillo Alejandro

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate our own experience with laparoscopic bladder neck suspension. The laparoscopic procedure is performed by anchoring a mesh from the vagina to the ligament, thus creating tension. This technique has several characteristics that make it very attractive: it is easy to learn, operating times are short and it is a commonly indicated procedure.

METHODS

We present a series of 72 women with history of urinary stress incontinence to whom a laparoscopic bladder neck suspension was indicated.

RESULTS

The procedure was completed in 69 patients, with a mean operative time of 40 minutes. Mean hospital stay was 1.6 days (Range 1 to 5 days). Continence rate was 82% after a median follow up of 31 months. 12 patients recurred after the operation, 7 of them recurred in the first 2 months and 5 had previous surgical history; this makes us think whether the technique was not adequately performed or the indication for treatment was not suitable.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that, although it is necessary a longer follow-up, laparoscopic bladder neck suspension can be considered a good alternative in the treatment of urinary stress incontinence.

Для цитирования: Hernández Fernández Carlos, de Palacio España Andrés, Escribano Patiño Gregorio, Díez Cordero Jose María, Bielsa Carrillo Alejandro. [Treatment of urinary stress incontinence using a laparoscopic technique].. Archivos espanoles de urologia. 2002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.